There are changes.
This commit is contained in:
47
Paper.md
47
Paper.md
@@ -61,7 +61,54 @@ found shelter there from Puritan persecution."[@AdamsMemBiog08, 104] He would
|
||||
later repeat this pattern of investigation and monument building in
|
||||
Massachusetts.
|
||||
|
||||
While in Cambridge, Horsford became very interested in the Vikings. This was
|
||||
part of a widespread movement; rising anti-irish and anti-catholic sentiment
|
||||
had put Columbus in an unfavorable light, and many casting around for some
|
||||
non-catholic discoverer of America settled on Leif Erickson as suitable, albeit
|
||||
pagan, predecessor [[NEED SOURCES FOR ALL THIS]]. When New England area
|
||||
newspapers at the time mentioned Erickson, they often made a comparison of his
|
||||
achievements to those of Columbus, who never fared well. In 1887,[@HorsDisc87,
|
||||
10] Horsford wrote the dedication for a large bronze statue of
|
||||
Erickson,[@GuttVal18, 86] commending him for his early discovery of America. He
|
||||
doesn't stop just there, though; he additionally asserts Leif sailed south
|
||||
after making the continent, all the way to Cape Cod. He explains his reasoning:
|
||||
|
||||
> ...if you will be kind enough to hold up to your mind's eye, now for a
|
||||
> moment, any familiar map of North America. Look at the east coast. From
|
||||
> Greenland, along the line to the southwest, you will notice three projections
|
||||
> into the sea. They are Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, and Cape Cod.[@HorsDisc87,
|
||||
> 9]
|
||||
|
||||
He disregards Newfoundland as an option, saying "[it] is bold, rocky,
|
||||
mountainous, of meagre vegetation, and with few beaches."[@HorsDisc87, 10]
|
||||
Ironically, the best evidence archaeologists have now for the location of
|
||||
Vinland is L'Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland. How his views were received in the
|
||||
moment, if those around him were surprised by this theory, is unclear. But his
|
||||
theories would see much criticism once published.
|
||||
|
||||
{{{THAT GUY WHO SAID HE WAS WRONG HORSFORD STARTS HIS FIRST BOOK WITH HIM }}}
|
||||
|
||||
Include part by that historian who wrote about how wrong he was[@HorsProb89, 1]
|
||||
|
||||
Summary of Horsford's defense, letter to judge Daly source[@HorsProb89]
|
||||
|
||||
Write about Horsford's "archaeology," what he says he found, his methods
|
||||
|
||||
Write about the dedication of the Norumbega Tower
|
||||
|
||||
Write about how Horsford connected his interest in Vikings and Leif Ericsson to
|
||||
the myth of Norumbega -- his interest in Native American language and how that
|
||||
let him make the connection.
|
||||
|
||||
Horsford read about how Alafonce described the natives of Norumbega speaking
|
||||
something closer to Latin; he interpreted that as being influenced by Norse.
|
||||
|
||||
The city of Norumbega was the last vestige of viking occupation
|
||||
|
||||
It is unclear when or how Horsford first heard about the myth of
|
||||
Norumbega, but it is possible it was widely known at the time. A newspaper
|
||||
(((TIME AND PAPER HERE))) mentions the myth in passing, well before Horsford
|
||||
made it regionally famous.
|
||||
|
||||
\pagebreak
|
||||
# References
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user