From be03a36d7555cec7b6006c88c5e6984b5d9b6e35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jacob Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 01:51:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Notes. --- Paper.md | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Paper.md b/Paper.md index 2c9db2c..e72777b 100644 --- a/Paper.md +++ b/Paper.md @@ -82,10 +82,20 @@ after making the continent, all the way to Cape Cod. He explains his reasoning: He disregards Newfoundland as an option, saying "[it] is bold, rocky, mountainous, of meagre vegetation, and with few beaches."[@HorsDisc87, 10] Ironically, the best evidence archaeologists have now for the location of -Vinland is L'Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland. How his views were received in the +Vinland is L'Anse aux Meadows, Newfoundland. Horsford + +-- How horsford disproves Nova Scotia +-- How Horsford uses etymology + +How his views were received in the moment, if those around him were surprised by this theory, is unclear. But his theories would see much criticism once published. One author, Justin Winsor, -found issue with Horsford's theory that the Vikings had made a notiv +found issue with Horsford's theory that Vikings had left a noticeable imprint +on Native American language: + +> Nothing could be slenderer than the alleged correspondences of languages, and +> we can see in Horsford's *Discovery of America by Northmen* to what a +> fanciful extent a confident enthusiasm can carry it.[@WinsNar89, 98-99] {{{THAT GUY WHO SAID HE WAS WRONG HORSFORD STARTS HIS FIRST BOOK WITH HIM }}} -- WinsNar89